Thursday, January 11, 2007

Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."- John F. Kennedy

I was sitting in my lounge room here in the land of Oz watching a bit of television, just vegging out after a hard days work.....when.....I saw a plane hit this Tower on the news. I continued to watch for the next 4 or so hours.

The reports kept say things like "a bomb went off" "there are secondary devices planted in the buildings" "it didn't look like any airliner I had seen" etc..etc. My first thoughts were they have done it again (planted bombs in the trade centre as they had done before.) As time went on I was curious to see reporters starting to ignore and/or deny that there were any explosions or secondary devices or anything else for that matter happening on that day, but I really didn't give it much thought, again going back to my fairly usual life like many others I go to work come home eat sleep and at times have some R & R.

I started to become interested in the 9/11 event when I saw a clip of George Bush sitting in a class room doing absolutely nothing when told America was under attack...(I already knew he had stolen the election to get where he is) for me what stuck in my mind was this man knows he is not in any danger his security men felt he wasn't either. The most powerful man in the world at that time sat there doing nothing as the terrorists wreaked their havoc on his country. Now I am curious! What has been happening? It has been 5 years and in that five years there has been a monstrous amount of visual and circumstantial evidence put forward for and against the "9/11 inside job movement."

Governments will spend billions of dollars in their war efforts, so it would be logical that they would spend millions shoring up support at home by debunking the 911 cover up movement.

As for anything that might carry any weight in the argument for some sort of Government involvement or physical and visual evidence put forward, the first thing the non-believers do is attack the authors of what may be a very good case for…say…a demolition collapse of the WTC’s.

The hard evidence was shipped away in record time to the 4 corners of the globe. Forensic analysts were not able to examine the crime scene….you have to ask why? Why wasn’t there a investigation done straight away…it took 411 days to put together a dubious team to investigate this crime with a budget which resembled the price of a meal in Paris.

Now after that you would think you would have hard evidence to convict the man they blamed and were chasing in Afghanistan but no! The FBI still has none.

I see people arguing that the molten metal found at the WTC site was because of some sort of exothermic oxidisation reaction (which incidentally would take years to melt without a accelerant such as thermite) but it doesn’t explain how the 47 steel columns came to melt and collapse within seconds. I have to ask. Or, how a jet airliner can fit into a 16 ft hole. Yes I have seen the cartoon computer models presented as fact. I need more proof.

Let’s face it you can prove anything using a computer model, even Lee Harvey Oswald firing off 3 shots within 2 seconds and hitting their mark with a old (1940) Mannlicher-Carcano Italian rifle which even the Italians wouldn’t use because they were so inaccurate.

William Rodriguez a hero in this saga was there he saw first hand what was going on. Rodriguez was the last survivor pulled from the rubble of the north tower of the WTC. Billionaire philanthropist Jimmy Walter and William Rodriguez this week embarked on a groundbreaking trip to Caracas Venezuela in which they met with with the President of the Assembly and will soon meet with Venezuelan President himself Hugo Chavez in anticipation of an official Venezuelan government investigation into 9/11.

The US government attempted to sabotage the trip by putting Rodriguez, who has been decorated at the White House itself, and Walter on a no fly list. Why? The evidence is there for all to see but people can’t believe that the government lies and is involved in covert operations . I wish they didn't. I guess real life isn’t like that.

10 January 2007
President George W Bush addresses the nation on the Iraq war telling them (humbly) to expedite an end to this war he has to send another 20,000 troops all in Baghdad.

Michael Moore has his say on the matter.

Dear Mr. President,

Thanks for your address to the nation. It's good to know you still want to talk to us after how we behaved in November.

Listen, can I be frank? Sending in 20,000 more troops just ain't gonna do the job. That will only bring the troop level back up to what it was last year. And we were losing the war last year! We've already had over a million troops serve some time in Iraq since 2003. Another few thousand is simply not enough to find those weapons of mass destruction! Er, I mean... bringing those responsible for 9/11 to justice! Um, scratch that. Try this -- BRING DEMOCRACY TO THE MIDDLE EAST! YES!!!

You've got to show some courage, dude! You've got to win this one! C'mon, you got Saddam! You hung 'im high! I loved watching the video of that -- just like the old wild west! The bad guy wore black! The hangmen were as crazy as the hangee! Lynch mobs rule!!!

Look, I have to admit I feel very sorry for the predicament you're in. As Ricky Bobby said, "If you're not first, you're last." And you being humiliated in front of the whole world does NONE of us Americans any good.

Sir, listen to me. You have to send in MILLIONS of troops to Iraq, not thousands! The only way to lick this thing now is to flood Iraq with millions of us! I know that you're out of combat-ready soldiers -- so you have to look elsewhere! The only way you are going to beat a nation of 27 million -- Iraq -- is to send in at least 28 million! Here's how it would work:

The first 27 million Americans go in and kill one Iraqi each. That will quickly take care of any insurgency. The other one million of us will stay and rebuild the country. Simple.

Now, I know you're saying, where will I find 28 million Americans to go to Iraq? Here are some suggestions:

1. More than 62,000,000 Americans voted for you in the last election (the one that took place a year and half into a war we already knew we were losing). I am confident that at least a third of them would want to put their body where there vote was and sign up to volunteer. I know many of these people and, while we may disagree politically, I know that they don't believe someone else should have to go and fight their fight for them -- while they hide here in America.

2. Start a "Kill an Iraqi" Meet-Up group in cities across the country. I know this idea is so early-21st century, but I once went to a Lou Dobbs Meet-Up and, I swear, some of the best ideas happen after the third mojito. I'm sure you'll get another five million or so enlistees from this effort.

3. Send over all members of the mainstream media. After all, they were your collaborators in bringing us this war -- and many of them are already trained from having been "embedded!" If that doesn't bring the total to 28 million, then draft all viewers of the FOX News channel.

Mr. Bush, do not give up! Now is not the time to pull your punch! Don't be a weenie by sending in a few over-tired troops. Get your people behind you and YOU lead them in like a true commander in chief! Leave no conservative behind! Full speed ahead!

We promise to write. Go get 'em W!


Michael Moore

Government Insider Says Bush
Authorized 911 Attacks

Keep in mind when reading this, that the man being interviewed is no two-bit
internet conspiracy buff.

Stanley Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen Bob Dole (R) and has personally known
Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades. This courageous man has risked his
professional reputation, and possibly his life, to get this information out to

The following is from his latest visit to Alex Jones' radio show.

Forwarded with Compliments of Free Voice of America (FVOA): Accurate News and
Interesting Commentary for America’s Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free.

Note: All honour to Stanley Hilton for risking his life so that we may know the
truth of 9/11.

The Bush Junta Unmasked

"This (9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush
personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty
of treason and mass murder." --Stanley Hilton

Alex Jones interview of Stanley Hilton, attorney for 911 taxpayers' lawsuit

Alex Jones Radio Show September 10, 2004 Transcription by 'Rat Cat'

AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole's chief of staff, very successful
counsellor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He
is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out - half of New
Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next
35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it's great to have
you on with us.

SH: Glad to be on.

AJ: We'll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a
nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you've deposed a lot of military officers.
You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?

SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller
and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and
abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush
personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as
well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in
order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf
of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to
point out that, just quickly; I went to school with some of these neocons. At
the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several
of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about
this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject -
how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus
Pearl Harbour event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35

AJ: That's right. They were all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor.
And now they are setting it up here in America. Stanley, I know you deposed a
lot of people and you've got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the
victim's families involved.

SH: 7 billion, 7 billion

AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating evidence
you've got of them ordering the attack?

SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers' class action lawsuit as well
as a suit on behalf of the families and the basic three arguments are they
violated the Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly that they
[garbled] fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush
presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get the Iraq war
authorization. And, of course, he related it to 9/11 and claimed that Saddam was
involved with that, and all these lies.

AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we've got to break. Let's come back and
get into the evidence. BREAK

AJ: All right my friends, second hour, September 10th, 2004, the anniversary of
the globalist attack coming up tomorrow. It's an amazing individual we have on
the line. Bob Dole's former chief of staff, political scientist, a lawyer, he
went to school with Rumsfeld and others, he wrote his thesis about how to turn
America into a dictatorship using a fake Pearl Harbour attack. He's suing the
U.S. government for carrying out 9/11. He has hundreds of the victims' families
signing onto it - it's a $7 billion lawsuit. And he is Stanley Hilton. I know
that a lot of stations just joined us in Los Angeles and Rhode Island and
Missouri and Florida and all over. Please sir, recap what you were just stating
and then let's get into the new evidence. And then we'll get into why you are
being harassed by the FBI, as other FBI people are being harassed who have been
blowing the whistle on this. So, this is really getting serious. Stanley, tell
us all about it.

SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleezza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc.
for complicity in personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering
it. The hijackers we retained and we had a witness who is married to one of
them. The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid
by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were
controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other places.
And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally ordered by George W.
Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well as
witnesses, to this effect. It's not just incompetence - in spite of the fact
that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this, knew about it.
He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to
be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th - when those videos showed that
Andrew Card whispered in his ear the [garbled] words about this he listened to
kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal.
These people had dress-rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos
of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a few months later at a
California press conference when he said he had, quote, "seen on television the
first plane attack the first tower." And that could not be possible because
there was no video. What it was the simulated video that he had gone over. So
this was a personally government-ordered thing. We are suing them under the
Constitution for violating Americans' rights, as well as under the federal
Fraudulent Claims Act, for presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress to justify
the bogus Iraq boondoggle war, for political gains. And also, under the RICO
statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt Organization Act, for being a corrupt
entity. And I've been harassed personally by the chief judge of the federal
court who is instructing me personally to drop this suit, threatened to kick me
off the court, after 30 years on the court. I've been harassed by the FBI. My
staff has been harassed and threatened. My office has been broken into and this
is the kind of government we are dealing with.

AJ: Absolutely and now it has come out - five separate drills of flying hijacked
jets into buildings that morning - which you told us about before it even broke
in the Associated Press. They were trying to get out ahead of you. You talked
about how you interviewed military people who were told it was a drill that
morning. Then to get out ahead of that, the news finally reported on it. Now,
we've learned that all these operations - I want to get into that, I want to
talk about the new incriminating evidence of ordering it and how they had
drilled on this, how Cheney was in the bunker controlling this. That has even
come out in the mainstream news but they won't release the details of that,
Stanley. But what type of FBI harassment are you going through?

SH: First of all, my office was burglarized in San
Francisco several months ago. Files were gone through and some files were seized
- particularly the ones dealing with the lady that was married to one of the
hijackers. Fortunately, I had spare copies in a hidden place so nothing
disappeared permanently. But more significantly, FBI agents have been harassing
one of my staff members and threatening them with vague but frightening threats
of indicting them. And it's just total harassment. They have planted a spy, an
undercover agent, in my organization, as we just recently discovered. In other
words, these are Nazi Germany tactics. This is the kind of government you have
in this country. This is what Bush is all about.

AJ: Stay there, Stanley, Bob Dole's former chief of staff. We'll come back after
this quick break. Please stay with us. BREAK

AJ: All right, eight minutes, 25 seconds into the second hour. Stanley Hilton,
political scientist, lawyer, Bob Dole's former chief of staff, is suing the
government for 7 billion dollars for carrying out 9/11 and for racketeering. And
he joins us now. During the break, I first really did the big interview with
Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on Fox News. And that interview got
massive attention. And then he kind of went underground for a while because a
judge, we're going to talk about that, ordered him to not do any more
interviews. And now he's back doing interviews. He's had his office broken into,
FBI threats and harassment. Bottom line, he has deposed military individuals,
wives of hijackers, you name it, it was a government operation. It has even come
out in mainstream news, a piece here, a piece there. They had drills on 9/11,
that's why NORAD stood down. Cheney was in control of the whole thing. Stanley
Hilton has now gotten documents about how Bush ordered the whole operation. And
I'll tell you right now, his life is in danger, folks. And he's got so much
courage. He went to school with these neocons at the University of Chicago. He
wrote his thesis on how the government could use terrorist attacks to set up
martial law. He is the man for the time and folks wondered why he disappeared
for a while and just did his lawsuit and wasn't doing interviews, it was because
he was ordered to. Stanley, can you get into that for us?

SH: I did an interview with you, Alex, back in March of 2003, about a year and a
half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by the emissary of
the chief judge of the federal court where I have the lawsuit. And I was warned
not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with discipline. And it
remained quiet until a couple of months ago and then I got on the air on some
programs and some publicity and July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief
judge here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge has been
circulating communiqués to the other federal judges seeking anything negative
she can get against me to try and discipline me after I've been on the court
here for 30 years with no disciplinary problems at all. This is suddenly
happening. And her assistants who are on the committee of the court met with me
on July 1st in Palo Alto, California, and threatened me directly. They handed me
a copy of the lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to dismiss this. What's
this? She doesn't like the content of it. This is politically incorrect. This is
outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400 plaintiffs, how am I going
to dismiss this case? And they threatened me directly and they said, "the next
time you'll be disciplined." And also they've threatened me not to go public,
etc. And this is just outrageous.

AJ: It's all colour of law. No direct orders, just all in your face.

SH: They sent a letter out, and of course they deny it's because of the
political content of the suit but they told me directly on the phone that it is
because of this suit and this judge is very, very angry, apparently has been in
contact with Ashcroft's Justice Department. I got a call from Ashcroft's Justice
Department a few months ago about this, demanding that I drop the suit,
threatening sanctions and all kinds of things. I refused to drop it. AJ: Now
let's go back over, you had them break into your office, harassment. Let's go
over that in detail.

SH: My office was broken into about 6 months ago. The file cabinets - it was
obvious they had been rifled through. Files were stolen. Files dealing with this
particular case and particularly with the documents I had regarding the fact
that the - some of these hijackers, at least some of them were on the payroll of
the U.S. government as undercover FBI, CIA, double agents. They are spying on
Arab groups in the U.S. And, in effect, all this led up to the effect that al
Qaeda is a creation of the George Bush administration, basically. That the
entity that he called al Qaeda is directly linked to George Bush. And all this
stuff was stolen. Fortunately, I had copies. But this was just part of the
harassment. The FBI has also been harassing some of my assistants and has
planted a spy in our midst. And it is just outrageous that these Nazi tactics
are being used - and the obstruction of justice, these people are criminals. And
that's what's happening under the tremendous pressure here to just drop it. Or
to shut up now and just go away.

AJ: Now, let's talk about what they want you to drop. Let's talk about, without
giving names, the people you deposed, what really happened, the picture you've
got. You said earlier that Bush ordered this; they were simulating this which
they now admit there were simulations on that morning. Let's go over what they
don't want you to talk about, Stanley.

SH: We have evidence both documentary as well as witness sworn statements from
undercover former FBI agents, FBI informants, etc., that other officials in the
Pentagon and the military and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there
were many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. Bush had seen
this simulated on TV many times. He blurted this out at a press conference in
California a few months after 9/11 where he said he had, quote, seen the first
plane hit the first building on the video. And that's not possible because there
was no official video of that. There was one of the second plane not the first
one. He had seen the first one. We do have some incriminating documents that
Bush personally ordered 9/11 events. It was well planned. A FEMA official has
admitted on tape that he was there the night before - September 10th, that is

AJ: And now Mayor Giuliani, a few months ago in the 911 Commission, admitted
that - Tripod II. They had their whole command post already moved out of
Building 7. Now, this is very, very important. This is a key area of this whole
event. You said months before it came out on the CIA's own website and the
Associated Press, you said I deposed people. They said there were drills that
morning and exactly what happened, happening - that was the smoke-screen for the
stand-down. And then to get out ahead of it, the CIA comes out and said yeah we
were running a drill that morning. Now, we've learned that five, possibly six,
were confirmed. Five of these - one drill with the exact same thing happening
that actually happened, at the exact same time in the morning. That's why NORAD
stood down with 24 different blips on the screen. You've said this. You brought
this up first. Now, I know you can't get too much into detail but can you tell
us how you learned of this?

SH: I have interviewed individuals in NORAD and the Air Force. I personally
toured NORAD many years ago around the time that I worked for Dole. I'm very
familiar with the operations at Cheyenne Mountain at Colorado Springs, where
NORAD is. Individuals that work in NORAD as well as the Air Force have stated
this, off the record, but the point is, yes, this was not just five drills but
at least 35 drills over at least two months before September 11th. Everything
was planned, the exact location

AJ: But five drills that day.

SH: That day, that day, and Bush thought it was a drill. That's the only
explanation for why he appeared nonchalant

AJ: We also had NORAD officers and civilian air traffic controllers going, "Is
this part of the exercise? Is this a drill?"

SH: Yes.

AJ: On the tapes and in TV interviews, they thought it was, quote, a drill.

SH: That's right. That's exactly what I said long before it became public. I've
known about this since earlier in March of '03, as I stated before. This was all
planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the
order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass
murder. And now, obstruction of justice by attempting to use a federal judge and
FBI agents to inhibit a legitimate civil lawsuit in this country, in federal
court. Even a chief judge in this court tried to harass and threaten me
personally for representing legitimate plaintiffs. And they got Clinton for
allegedly lying under oath about Paula Jones and now - look what's happening
now. And Ken Starr used to be across from me in Duke Law School in the early
`70s and it’s interesting that he got away with trying to get Clinton impeached,
so we have a far worse criminal sitting in the oval office today - somebody
guilty of mass murder as well as obstruction of justice.

AJ: Well, I mean look, they say they never heard of a plan to fly planes into
buildings - said it all over television - Rice, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and
Ashcroft. And then we find out they were running all these drills that morning.
Even if they weren't involved, that proves they were liars about ever hearing of
such a plan.

SH: Well, I'm trying to take their depositions - I've been trying to take their
depositions for months. They've been trying to object to it. They will have to
admit they were either lying then or now. It's clearly perjury either way. They
are liars and perjurers; that's what they are. These are the people that we have
running this government and, of course, they knew about it. How are they going
to claim now that they didn't know about these drills? Their idea is that nobody
knew anything. It's the old know-nothing mentality. And how anybody considers
this believable is beyond me.

AJ: All right, now people ask how could a huge organization, how could the
AWACs, how could the military let this happen; whereas before, if your Cessna
got off course for five minutes, they would launch F-16s on you. It's real
simple. It's what Stanley Hilton said here a year and a half ago. It's what came
out in the news after that. The military, good people were told this was all a
drill. And it was not a drill. And ABC News admits that Cheney was in control of
[?] out of the White House [?] and that he ordered the military to quote "do
something." Our inside sources from Hilton and others say it was a stand down
and they admit they will not release that under national security. Stanley?

SH: Well they are going to admit it, they're going to release it in the court
case because if you demand it under subpoena powers and they must release it.
And part of our lawsuit is brought in the name of the U.S. because under the
federal fraudulent [Claims Act], we accuse the Bush Administration of presenting
a fraudulent claim to Congress. And under the statutes of Title 31 of the U.S.
code, they must release this information. That's why they are trying to threaten
me, harass me, invade my office, steal my files, commit blatant obstruction of
justice and other crimes to try and prevent a legitimate civil suit from
exposing these criminals and their acts of treason and mass murder.

AJ: I think you need to publicly tell folks that you are not planning suicide.
Would you like to tell folks that?

SH: (laughs) I'm not planning suicide. I've got family and I'm not planning that
but I don't like the threats I'm under - but I can tell you this, it's taking a
toll emotionally on me and my staff. And particularly, when you get a threat
from the chief judge of your own court.

AJ: Why have you decided to go public again after a year of being under the

SH: Because the more and more evidence that I've been
adducing over a year and a half has made it so obvious to me that this was now
without any doubt a government operation and that it amounts to the biggest act
of treason and mass murder in American history. I mean George Bush makes
Benedict Arnold look like a patriot. He makes Benedict Arnold look like George
Washington. I mean that's what we have - a criminal and a traitor sitting in the
White House pretending he's a patriot, wrapping himself in the flag. And it's
pretty disgusting because the other side of the so-called opposition, the Kerry
camp is just saying nothing because they're afraid to speak.

AJ: Stay right there. We'll be right back.


AJ: Stanley Hilton will be with us for another 15 or 16 minutes. Then he's got
to go into court. Bob Dole's former chief of staff, political scientist, lawyer,
represents 400 plus plaintiffs - most of them victims of 9/11. When I was in New
York last week, everybody I was talking to, I mean 90 plus percent of them at
ground zero - "I had family, I worked in the buildings, my son's a Navy Seal -
he called the night before and said don't go to work." You know, all of this,
and then now they never had any idea - and it turns out they had all these
drills - and one drill of hijacked jets flying into the World Trade Centre and
Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. That morning - come on people! And Stanley
Hilton brought all this out on this show before it was in the mainstream news.
And I was talking to him during the break. I mean, the harassment, the moles,
the threatening of his staff, the judge threatening him. Stanley, let's get
specifically into the documents that you have now got that they have now been
robbing you for, that you luckily, thank God had copies. Specifically, Bush
ordering this. Can you get into that for us - ordering 9/11?

SH: National Security Council classified documents which
[garbled] and it's was part of a series of documents that were involved with the
drill documents. This was all planned - they had it on videotape. These planes
were controlled by remote control, as I stated previously a year and a half ago,
there's a system called Cyclops. There is a computer chip in the nose of the
plane and it enables the ground control, the military ground control, to disable
the pilot's control of the plane and to control it and to fly it directly into
those towers. That's what happened. It's also a technology used on what's called
the Global Hawk, which is an aircraft drone - a remote- controlled aircraft. And
they were doing it. We are talking about National Security Council classified
documents that clearly indicated that [garbled] had a green light to order this
to go and this is no drill. These drills that were running were clearly a dress
rehearsal and this was a government operation. You wonder why these people are
trying to threaten people and trying to intimidate people who have written this
suit, I guess if you murdered 3000 of your own citizens, in conjunction with the
corrupt Royal family of Saudi Arabia as Bush did. And if you then waste billions
more on a worthless garbage war in Iraq, I guess you've got something to worry
about and you want to threaten people to prevent it from coming out.

AJ: I mean let's look at this. Not only are there dress rehearsals, they are
smoke screens so the good military stands down and doesn't know what's
happening. But it's now coming out, even in mainstream news, that yes these
drills were going on. Yes, and some of these drills, quote, passenger-type jets
were under remote control - this is decades old technology. In 1958, NORAD was [
] old jets and using them for target practice. Decades ago they flew jumbo jets
from LA to Sidney Australia. So since that's going on, everybody knows that. And
it's the same MO. Just like the first World Trade Centre [bombing] where they
get two retarded men who followed this blind sheik who had a tiny mosque above a
pizza parlour. And they set them up as the patsies. Then the FBI cooks the bomb,
trains the drivers. This informant goes, "You're not going to bomb the building?
They go "Yeah, we're letting it go forward." He tapes them to protect them. The
two retarded gentlemen, thank God, didn't park it up against the column, as the
FBI instructed them to do, so it didn't bring down the tower - because you have
to be right up against the column. That doesn't happen. Yet, it's the same thing
with 9/11. You've got these CIA agents, these Arabs, who were trained at U.S.
military bases, Pensacola Naval Air Station - mainstream media, out creating
their legends for this background. They're on board the aircraft. My military
sources say nerve gas kills everybody on board the plane - nerve gas packets.
Then they fly the planes into buildings. From your inside sources, is that

SH: It's one of the things that we are looking into - that nerve gas or
something else disabled people. It's possible. I can't say for sure to be honest
with you

AJ: All you know is they were government agents and they were on board and the
planes were remote controlled.

SH: Yeah, it was basically a smokescreen. I mean, the events of the hijackings,
how someone snuck in those cutters, it was a plant. It was like a classic decoy.
I've got some military background. And it's called decoy. It's a decoy
operation. You make the people focus on the decoy to avoid looking at the real
criminals. So they are focusing on these so-called nineteen hijackers and
saying, "Oh, it must have been these Arabs. When, in fact, the guilty person is
at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue - sitting in the oval office. That's the guilty
person. That's the one who authorized it. There is only one man who could have
authorized this operation and that's Bush. And anyone at NORAD will tell you as
I have been told personally at NORAD in the war control room, there is only one
man who has the power to do this kind of thing and that's Bush. Even though many
believe he's a puppet. And I think in many ways he is. The fact of the matter is
where was [ ] Cheney, Rumsfeld and these other traitors. The fact is Bush
personally ordered and he's guilty and liable and he's going to be re-elected
apparently because the media's asleep and [garbled] for Bush. AJ: Well, the
media is owned by the same military industrial complex that carried out the

SH: Yeah, the media is only interested in maintaining the official government
fantasy that this was a little lone Arab. These Arabs couldn't even steer that
plane down a runway.

AJ: Stay there Stanley, final segment coming up. BREAK

AJ: Mr. Hilton, when you talk to these FBI agents, when you talk to these
military men and women, what's their attitude? They've got to be pretty freaked
out to have the big picture and know what actually happened on 9/11.

SH: Yes, you know it's like clouds just before a thunderstorm in the sense that
they are sort of pregnant with rage. They are just enraged at the criminal
politicians who have perverted and misused the government to murder its own
citizens and pursue these dubious political ends. And many of them, in
increasing numbers, are willing to talk and will talk under subpoena - but only
under subpoena because the official party line of the government is shut up and
don't talk to the trial lawyer. But more and more, they are very outraged that
part of the government has done this to its own people, to its own people. I
mean you have to go back to Stalin to see something - not even Hitler did this
to his own people. You have to look at Stalin who murdered the Kulaks, the
Russians for his own dubious gains. Also we've got - we have a Stalinist
mentality in this country. And, if these people pose as patriots and wrap
themselves in the flag, it's disgusting. I wanted also to point out that the
Japanese television network, Asahi, is going to be airing a special on primetime
tomorrow, on September 11th. They interviewed me for eight hours a couple of
weeks ago. I'll be on that. I wish - of course, the America media don't care so
they are not going to care. But in Japan, people are very serious in
interviewing me and others. And we have a website now, called deprogram. info,
if more people are interested: But the other thing, I just
wanted to say that if anything happens to me - and I don't know why - because
I'm being threatened here now. And it seems you can't bring a case in this
country anymore against criminals in power without being threatened. And this is
how they operate. The stakes are pretty high when you've got a world historical
level of treason and fraud by this government against its own people. I guess
this is what you have to expect.

AJ: Stanley, the globalist, the new world order crowd, definitely intend to
carry out more terror attacks. I know they would have carried out more attacks
if we wouldn't have done what we've been up to, if you wouldn't have been out
there boldly speaking out and many others. And then their electronic Berlin wall
has a bunch of cracks in it now. Thanks to good people like yourself and many
others who are speaking out and telling the truth. But do you think that they
may carry out what they've been hyping - a suitcase nuke attack, a biological
release to try to smokescreen all of this? I know it's a catch 22; you've got to
expose the murderers. We've got to get the word out on this but some government
people that I've talk to say, "Yeah, but if you do that, they are going to go
even more hard core and must totally try to take over." But I say regardless,
they are already doing that. So what do you say to that?

SH: Well, yeah, I think they have an agenda. They have contingency plans. I
think they are laying low now because there are an increasing number of people,
like myself, who are openly challenging them and accusing them of criminal
conduct. I think they would have done it again if we had not spoken up. I think
they're planning, what they would like to do is silence any dissenters. That's
why we are trying to get the Patriot Act declared unconstitutional in this
lawsuit also.

AJ: Let's talk about polls. In the beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated
and feared, but in time when his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because
then it costs nothing to be a patriot. You are one of those guys who hit the
barbwire for us, or figuratively jumped on the hand grenade for America. But
when you've got a Zogby poll, who is highly respected, half of New Yorkers
believe that the government was involved. When you have a Canadian poll, 63% on
average believe that the U.S. government was involved. And some groups, as high
as 76% in polls believe the government was involved. European polls, two- thirds
show the same thing. We have German defence ministers and technology ministers
and another member of their government now, three of them going public, known
conservatives, and progressives. You have an environment minister, Michael
Meacher, saying that if they didn't do it, they sure as hell knew what was going
on. Look, if anybody who is a thinking person looks at the evidence, their
official story is impossible. Then you investigate and they are involved in it.
Comments to this massive awakening and what's happening.

SH: Well, I think that's why they want the Patriot Act to suppress political
dissent. They have to, they're anticipating, they are not dumb individuals. I
know these people personally, Wolfowitz. These are criminal individuals but they
are smart and so they anticipated political dissent. And that's why, like the
Nazis, their forebears, and their blood brothers, the Nazis and the Stalinists,
they're all for political repression. Every corrupt and criminal government has
done this - they suppress their own people: Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, and
Mao Tse-tung, that's why we have the Patriot Act. So it's hand in hand. They had
it planned to go right up to September 11th, this was all part of the plan. You
have to do it. It was part of my senior thesis. You must follow through the
terrorist’s attacks with a political suppression mechanism in the law. And
that's why they want Patriot I and Patriot II and their plans are to continue
launching more terrorist attacks to justify even more repression. The goal is to
make this a one party dictatorship in this country, to pursue their dubious ends
with their blood brothers like the Saudi Royal family. And also, historical
blood brothers, such as the Nazi Germany and the Communist Russian. That's the

AJ: You've got to go in just a minute or two. But I wanted to also tell you
about New York. Sound cannons that are used in Iraq, they're against us. Men in
black ski masks. 41,000 police, accredited media being arrested randomly.
Children being arrested, people in wheelchairs, 2000 plus people put in a camp
with barbwire fences inside with no bathrooms. You had to have permission to go
to the porta-potties. Police screaming at you. It had nothing to do with
terrorism. They are openly setting the precedent for martial law.

SH: Well, that's right, the word terrorist is now being overly broad and overly
defined [garbled] and also, you know, it's like the word communist was used for
anything during the McCarthy witch hunt. And anybody can be called a terrorist
by Bush's definition. But the irony is that the number one terrorist in the
world is living at the White House at the oval office today. That's the real
irony. For sheer hypocrisy, I think he deserves the world prize and ought to be
in the Ripley book, Believe It or Not, and the Guinness book of world records
for sheer brazen chicanery and fraud.

AJ: Let me ask you a question on this because this is the experience that I had.
Watching television, watching the killers, watching those that are guilty, stand
up there as our saviours is incredibly painful. It's like watching Ted Bundy
being the judge at his own trial. I mean it is just painful to know who these
people are. To see them putting America in a shredder. Now we are going to have
forced psychological testing of every American, forced drugging, you know
Pan-American unions, I mean it's just all happening; it's in our face, Stanley.

SH: Yeah, it's very disturbing and as one who has studied the theory and concept
of dictatorships, I personally interviewed Albert Speer, who was Hitler's
armaments minister. I interviewed him in 1981 in Munich. And I've studied the
psychology and history of totalitarianism and there is no question that it's
very frightening. And it has, today, with high technology, albeit for the first
time in history, the chance of having a world empire dominated by corrupt,
technologically oriented government - an elite government. And they've got now
what people like Napoleon and Hitler didn't have, which is the technological
means to dominate not only their own country but others - the world.

AJ: The answer is to expose them as the terrorists, to show how PNAC [Project
for the New American Century] said we need helpful Pearl Harbour events, to show
how Northwood’s called for the exact 9/11-style attacks, to show their own
plans. And to force people to face this horror. What are they going to do in a
year or two when 80% of us, not half of us, know the truth?

SH: Well, that's why they want repression and, then again, the ancient old
diversion, launch another terrorist attack to get people to pitch it away. I
mean who knows what they'll do next. I mean their capacity for ingenious
creation of these events is sort of unravelled. I mean there is no limit. My
guess is they are going to try another stunt - maybe a stunt just before the
election to justify getting Bush re-elected. Although it seems like he is
running against a straw man or a ghost right now, anyway. But, my guess is
they'll try some other tactic to get people's attention away from 9/11 if it
gets to be too much attention. What you really want is for the public to just
lose interest because the public - and it's like remember the Alamo, you know,
people don't forget things like that. To me it's like the Alamo, remember 9/11,
that ought to be the slogan for this outrageous act of treason. That's what it
is. It's not

AJ: We are at a crossroads, I don't think they anticipated this much resistance,

SH: Yeah, I hope they are truly wrong and as incompetent as they are corrupt and
guilty. That means their incompetence is exceeded only by their corruption and
their guilt. And eventually, if enough people are going to get outraged enough,
these people in the bureaucracy and in the civil service and our military, and
eventually we can get people under subpoena these individuals will be exposed.

AJ: Stanley, their whole operation hinges on us being naïve and not recognizing
evil. This is what they got with Hitler and others. People couldn't recognize
evil so they continued to repeat succumbing to it. We are recognizing it this
time. We are putting our lives, our treasure, our future on the line for freedom
because we cannot let these blood-thirsty control freak terrorists capture us
and use us and turn us into the empire and have a draft and use us as their
slaves to invade the planet. And that's their PNAC plan. Stanley Hilton, I know
you've got to get to court. God bless you. I want to thank you for being here
with us today. Can we get you back on next week?

SH: Sure, just give me a call.

AJ: God bless you my friend. Any closing comments?

SH: My closing comments would be, I think people ought to just think about the
consequence of having someone like Bush in the White House and the danger for
the future that these sorts of individuals pose. This is not just a historical
event of the past. This is part of the plan and the camera is still rolling.
They have an agenda. These individuals are extremely dangerous. They are armed
and dangerous. They pose a clear and dangerous threat to every freedom-loving
person not only American but in the whole world.

AJ: You are absolutely right Stanley Hilton. They have captured the government.
They have not captured the peoples' minds and they are counting on us not facing
up to it.

SH: And they are counting on the repressive Patriot Act and threats and chief
judges and FBI agents threatening people who are exposing them. That's what they
are counting on.

AJ: But you're not backing down are you, my friend.

SH: No, I'm not

AJ: Well, we all stand with you, my brother, and God bless you.

SH: All right. Thank you

This is a short clip of a fireman stating the obvious.

This is a clip from the CameraPlanet 9/11 Archive. For information regarding full resolution clips of this material, or the archive - email

Word Trade Center, September 11th, WTC, Terrorism, New York, Osama Bin Laden.

I have posted a link to a very good site posted by Caustic Logic Publications which considers
LIHOP/MIHOP which translates to they Let It Happen On Purpose or Made It Happen On Purpose.

There is excellent well researched material on this site and worth a look.

Top Journalists Expose Major Cover-ups in Mass Media

Jane Akre spent 20 years as a network and local TV reporter for news and mass media operations throughout the country. Recently, she and her husband, investigative reporter Steve Wilson, were awarded the Goldman Environmental Prize for their struggle with the story told in this chapter.

By February 1997 our story was ready to air. It attempted to answer some troubling questions: Why had Monsanto sued two small dairies to prevent them from labeling their milk as coming from cows not injected with [growth hormone rBGH]? Why had two Canadian health regulators claimed that their jobs were threatened—and then said Monsanto offered them a bribe to give fast-track approval to the drug? Why did Florida supermarkets break their much-publicized promise that milk in the dairy case would not come from hormone-treated cows “until it gained widespread acceptance?" And why was the US the only major industrialized nation to approve this controversial genetically engineered hormone? (p. 211)

Station managers were so proud of our work that they saturated virtually every Tampa Bay radio station with thousands of dollars’ worth of ads urging viewers to watch what we’d uncovered about “The Mystery in Your Milk.” But then, our Fox managers’ pride turned to panic. [Monsanto lawyer] John Walsh wrote that some points of the story “clearly contain the elements of defamatory statements which, if repeated in a broadcast, could lead to serious damage to Monsanto and dire consequences for Fox News.” (pp. 211-213)

It was not long after our [unsuccessful] struggle to air an honest report had begun that Fox fired both the news director and the general manager. The new general manager, Dave Boylan, explained that if we didn’t agree to changes that Monsanto and Fox lawyers were insisting upon, we’d be fired for insubordination within 48 hours. We pleaded with Dave to look at the facts we’d uncovered, many of which conclusively disproved Monsanto’s claims. We reminded him of the importance of the facts about a basic food most of our viewers consume and feed to their children daily. His reply: “We paid $3 billion dollars for these TV stations. We’ll tell you what the news is. The news is what we say it is!” Steve [the author’s husband and coworker] was firm but respectful when he made it clear we would neither lie nor distort any part of the story. (pp. 213-215)

[The Dairy Coalition’s director] took great pride in bragging that the Coalition “snowed the station with paperwork and pressure to have the story killed.” Fox threatened our job every time we resisted the dozens of changes that would sanitize the story and fill it with lies and distortions. [Fox lawyer] Forest finally leveled with us. “You guys don’t get it. It doesn’t matter whether the facts are true. This story isn’t worth a couple of hundred thousand dollars to go up against Monsanto.” (pp. 217, 218)

Fox’s general manager presented us with an agreement that would give us a full year of salaries and benefits worth $200,000 in no-show “consulting jobs,” but with strings attached: no mention of how Fox covered up the story and no opportunity to ever expose the facts Fox refused to air. We turned down this second hush money offer. We were both finally fired, allegedly for “no cause.” (p. 219)

The controversy over rBGH has traveled recently to Canada and the European Union, both of which decided to reject the drug for use in those countries. (p. 236)

For updates on their lawsuit, see the Ms. Akre and Mr. Wilson’s website at

Major Government, Military Corruption
Trillions Missing at Defense Department

One of the most stunning underreported stories in the media is the well-established fact that at the very least hundreds of billions of dollars (if not trillions) are missing from the accounts of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld himself admitted that $2.3 trillion may be missing. Why hasn't this astounding evidence of major government and military corruption broadcast in headline news around the world? Why isn't anyone talking about it now?

" 'According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions,' Rumsfeld admitted. $2.3 trillion — that's $8,000 for every man, woman and child in America."
-- CBS News, 1/29/02, U.S. Secretary of Defense raises evidence of government, military corruption

"A GAO report found Defense inventory systems so lax that the U.S. Army lost track of 56 airplanes, 32 tanks, and 36 Javelin missile command launch-units. When military leaders were scrambling to find enough chemical and biological warfare suits to protect U.S. troops, the department was caught selling these suits as surplus on the Internet 'for pennies on the dollar.' "
-- San Francisco Chronicle, 5/18/03

"The Defense Department spent an estimated $100 million for airline tickets that were not used over a six-year period and failed to seek refunds even though the tickets were reimbursable."
-- New York Times, 6/9/04

As the media is failing so badly at getting this news out, we've put together below excerpts from the few media articles and government documents which reported the problem. Click on the links provided for verification. To understand how the media is failing at its job on this and other critically important stories, read our two-page summary by top journalists at You can help to change this vastly irresponsible behavior by informing your friends and colleagues and calling on all of our media and elected representatives to address this critical problem. Together, we can and will build a brighter future.

With best wishes,
Fred Burks for PEERS and the Team
Former language interpreter for Presidents Bush and Clinton